|
Dear horrible Anonymous User and friends,
RE: Your latest comment, which I found too ridiculous to even read due to your sheer atheist obesity related mental deterioration
1. You and the other rather mentally-disabled members of your rather liberal website that falsely purports to be "rational" have such flabby midsections that you are mentally incapable of find a single piece of evidence that we are inaccurate or incorrect in Conservapedia's articles pertaining to the topics of atheism, evolution, or homosexuality, all of which were largely contributed to by me. In regards to the undeniable fact that there is no proof or evidence that any of these worldviews hold any water whatsoever, it wasn't at all challenging for us to put together some articles that cleverly attempt to offer counterexamples that pertain to these worldviews.
2. I soundly thrashed you folks on the talk pages of the Conservapedia articles that they were rather understandably angered by, plus on other places on the internet as well (atheism, evolution, homosexuality, etc.) Therefore, it is only fitting that your claim that I am afraid to debate has no merit. I am most obviously not claiming that it is pertaining to my excellent debating prowess that I won so many debates with you folks, it is just that atheism is such an incredibly weak position with a flabby midsection - especially compared to Christianity, which, however, has overwhelming evidence to support it.
3. I met my goals that I sought to achieve regarding my participation with Conservapedia, the Trustworthy Encyclopedia. Anything else that I do further is just icing on the cake.
4. Encyclopedias are almost invariably supposed to involve multiple editors and personally, I haven't seen a single encyclopedia that I fully agree with. Feel free to get upset like a baby at Conservapedia and find cracks in it, but I really don't think that you can find any credible evidence that we are inaccurate or incorrect in the Conservapedia articles in regards to atheism, evolution, or homosexuality.
5. I know that it angers
to no end that I have met my goals and hereby declare VICTORY, since I have the ability as a Conservapedia sysop to block anyone who has the nerve to attempt to dilute the definitions of atheism and liberalism, and yet you still want to find fault in me. However, I have still succeeded in being more like my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ once and for all, in that I have delivered yet another punch to your flabby midsection! You on the other hand, have also succeeded at being more like your Lord and Savior Richard Dawkins, in that you probably largely agree with his rape apologetics in regards to Elevatorgate!
In regards to all of that, I hereby challenge you to A SECOND WRITTEN DEBATE. In this debate, I challenge you to prove to me that atheism is true and correct (which you probably won't be able to do anyway, due to the inherent glass jaw of atheism), and once I achieve victory, it will all but destroy atheism on the internet ONCE AND FOR ALL!!!
However, it will only be under THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS (in bold):
- In case you attempt to martyr me in your anger as a result of my inevitable VICTORY, I get to bring with me a largely defensive weapon of gun.
- You are to pay an exact total of
$25,000.00 $5,550,500, which will be donated by a trustworthy bible-believer of your choosing to a faith-based Christian charitable organization of your choosing upon successful completion of the debate.
- The debate will be written, and will be 30 hours long (which can be broken up over a 120 month period).
6. Well so long, you obese, militant, atheistic, and probably homosexual commie! Oh, and one more piece of Christian love for Horrible Anonymous User: I wish that your mother had just aborted you, you ugly, disgusting pig!
DISCLAIMER: It's not that I hate you, it's just that I don't want you to exist. >:-b
Sincerely,
Conservative
|
|